|Success in formal 'pen and paper' examinations is often seen to be a sign of intelligence.|
To what extent do you agree with the view that formal examinations measure intelligence ?
Many schools have assessed the intellect of their students by using 'pen and paper' examinations. It is generally believed that by doing this, people could calculate the cleverness of these people.
First and foremost, through exams, people could know their knowledgable abilities by looking at the final scores. There are more various types of test such as multiple choice and writing. Therefore, students would be test in a comprehensive way. Moreover, doing these test papers could help them improve their critical thinkings and assignments. They are more likely to be successful in some industries as they have absorbed many knowledge during the preparation time for the exams. However, there would be more and more rote learnings due to the fact that these paper tests are quite predictable.
On the other hand, testing by papers might not really measure all the intellectual capacities of students. There would be more different types of smart that could be measured in some other ways. Some individuals would become stressful while doing the examination, hence their bad scores, although they have done very well in class. Additionally, not having tests with flying colors might not mean that they are foolish. Some subjects like Art, Music and Design, for instance, need creativity rather than learn in a stereotypical way. Furthermore, some people perhaps good at verbal skills instead of writing. Nevertheless, there is no evidence about several kinds of intelligence or just one kind of it.
In conclusion, 'test and paper' exams might be the measurement for the intelligence quotes, but it also has some limitations in some circumstances. Therefore, other ways of measuring are necessary.
( P/s: Could you tell how many scores would I get in an actual IELTS exam if I wrote like this? Thank you! )